<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aide-Memoire &#187; psychology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://katecarruthers.com/blog/tag/psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://katecarruthers.com/blog</link>
	<description>an aid to memory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 14:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Neuromarketing and mind over matter</title>
		<link>http://katecarruthers.com/blog/2009/11/neuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=neuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter</link>
		<comments>http://katecarruthers.com/blog/2009/11/neuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Carruthers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://katecarruthers.com/blog/?p=6929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fkatecarruthers.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2Fneuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter%2F"><br /> <br /> </a> <p>A recent study in Scientific American about <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=neuromarketing-brain&#38;page=2">How the Brain Reveals Why We Buy</a> discusses advances in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience">neuroscience</a> that are giving rise to a new field of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromarketing">neuromarketing</a>.</p> <p>The article cites the famous example of Coke v. Pepsi &#8211; where blind taste tests showed a preference [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="small" count="" href="http://katecarruthers.com/blog/2009/11/neuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter/"></g:plusone></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fkatecarruthers.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2Fneuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fkatecarruthers.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2Fneuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter%2F&amp;source=kcarruthers&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;service_api=R_5c4993bb8efb6f7eb0b256d87fe061f2&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>A recent study in Scientific American about <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=neuromarketing-brain&amp;page=2">How the Brain Reveals Why We Buy</a> discusses advances in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience">neuroscience</a> that are giving rise to a new field of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromarketing"><em>neuromarketing</em></a>.</p>
<p>The article cites the famous example of Coke v. Pepsi &#8211; where blind taste tests showed a preference for Pepsi, whereas visible labels gave rise to a preference for Coke.  Brain imaging shows that different parts of the brain are activated for each result.   This kind of technology enabled insight into our feelings will revolutionise focus groups.<img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-6932" title="Shopping Bags" src="http://katecarruthers.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Plastic_Shopping_Bag-150x150.jpg" alt="Shopping Bags" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>It seems that as neuroscience advances it will inevitably inform our marketing practices.  This means that marketing will begin its transition from <em>black art</em> &#8211; in the hands of the creative folks &#8211; to <em>science</em> &#8211; in the hands of the boffins.</p>
<p>We are moving into a time of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning">Pavlovian</a> marketing where <em>stimulus + response = results</em> based on scientific and quantifiable principles.  No more will people say &#8220;I know 50% of advertising works, I&#8217;m just not sure which 50%&#8221;.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how long this transition takes.
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fkatecarruthers.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2Fneuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fkatecarruthers.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2Fneuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter%2F&amp;source=kcarruthers&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;service_api=R_5c4993bb8efb6f7eb0b256d87fe061f2&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="small" count="" href="http://katecarruthers.com/blog/2009/11/neuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter/"></g:plusone></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://katecarruthers.com/blog/2009/11/neuromarketing-and-mind-over-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

